Golf free swing measurement and analysis system

ABSTRACT

The presented invention relates to a method for determining the effectiveness of a golfer&#39;s swing without the requirement of the club head making contact with a golf ball. More specifically, the present invention relates to a measurement and analysis system comprising a first module that attaches to the club head and captures measurement receiver signal strength data during the entire swing time line and may capture motional data on same time line, further first module wirelessly communicates bi-directionally with a second module that is further connected to a user interface device and computational engine where feedback results are derived and conveyed to the golfer. The system provides comprehensive feedback for a swing characterization time line referenced to the spatial domain using receiver signal strength measurements that may be in combination with motional and dynamics orientation measurements.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This patent application is a continuation-in-part application of patentapplication U.S. Ser. No. 13/225,433 filed on Sep. 3, 2011 entitled“Golf Free Swing Measurement and Analysis System” that is incorporatedherein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The presented invention relates to a method for determining theeffectiveness of a golfers swing without the requirement of the clubhead making contact with a golf ball. More specifically, the presentinvention relates to a system comprising a first module that attaches tothe club head and captures measurement data and relative position dataduring the entire swing, further first module wirelessly communicatesbi-directionally with a second module that is further connected to auser interface device and computational engine where feedback resultsare calculated and conveyed to the golfer. The system providescomprehensive feedback for swing characterization for detailed swingtiming results, dynamic club head orientation and motion metrics anddynamics shaft actions all referenced to the spatial domain.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There are numerous prior art external systems disclosures using videoand or laser systems to analyze the golf swing. There are also numerousgolf club attached systems using shaft mounted strain gauges and orsingle to multiple accelerometers and gyros to calculate golf swingmetrics. However, none of these prior art approaches contemplate amobile system with sensors attached to the club head and use receiversignal strength measurements to correlate time line measurements withthe spatial domain for the non-linear travel path of the club headduring a golf swing.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,646 to Hammond integrates three-dimensionalorthogonal axes accelerometers in the club head, and describes a meansfor wirelessly transmitting and receiving the resulting sensor signals.However, he does not contemplate the computational algorithms involvingthe multi-lever mechanics of a golf club swing required to solve for allthe angles of motion of the club head during the swing with a varyingswing radius. His premise of being able to obtain face angle only withdata from his sensors 13, and 12 (x and y directions respectivelydescribed below) is erroneous, as for one example, the toe down anglefeeds a large component of the radial centrifugal acceleration ontosensor 12 which he does not account for. He simply does not contemplatethe effects of the dynamically changing orientation relationship betweenthe inertial acceleration forces and the associated coordinate systemacting on the club head constrained by the multi-lever golf swingmechanics and the fixed measurement coordinate system of the threeorthogonal club head sensors.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,672,781 to Churchill uses receiver signal strengthmeasurements with multiple directional antennas in combination withlinear calculation methods based on acceleration measurements todetermine the location of a movable bodies that could be a golf club.Churchill fails to contemplate using RSSI measurements without the useof directional sectorized antennas in combination with sensorsmeasurements analysis applied to a movable object with non-lineartravel.

The prior art disclosures fail to teach a golf free swing analysissystem that measures receiver signal strength at the club head thatdefines a swing time line of the non-linear club head travel path forthe entire swing that is associated and referenced to the spatialdomain. Further, the receiver signal strength time line may be used inassociation with synchronized motional sensor measurements also taken atthe club head to define the swing characteristics of nonlinear travelpath of the club head referenced to the locations(s) in spatial domainfor the entire non-impact swing.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a golf swing measurement and analysis systemthat measures directly and stores time varying acceleration forcesduring the entire golf club swing. The measurement and analysis systemcomprises four major components; a golf club, a club head module (firstmodule) that is attachable to and removable from the club head, a secondmodule that is located and a predetermined location and a computerprogram. The golf club comprises a shaft and a club head with the clubhead comprising a face and a top surface where the module is attached.The first module comprise a means to measure acceleration separately onthree orthogonal axes, and first module or second module or both moduleshave a means of measuring receiver signal strength. First module andsecond module have means to communicate wirelessly and second module hasa means to transport the measured data to a computer or other smartdevice where the computer program resides. The computer programcomprises computational algorithms for calibration of data andcalculation of golf metrics described on a time line and furthercorrelation of that time line to the spatial domain, and support codefor user interface commands and inputs and visual display of themetrics.

During operation the module is attached on the head of the golf club,and during the entire golf swing it captures data from the threeacceleration sensors axes. The acquired swing measurement data is eitherstored in the module for later analysis or transmitted immediately fromthe module to a receiver with connectivity to a computation engine. Acomputational algorithm that utilizes the computational engine is basedon a custom multi-lever golf swing model utilizing both rigid andnon-rigid levers. This algorithm interprets the measured sensor data todetermine the dynamically changing relationship between an inertialcoordinates system defined by the multi-lever model for calculation ofinertial acceleration forces and the module measurement axes coordinatesystem attached to the club head. Defining the dynamically changingorientation relationship between the two coordinate systems allows theinterpretation of the measured sensor data with respect to a non-lineartravel path allowing the centrifugal and linear acceleration componentsto be separated for each of the module's three measured axes. Now witheach of the module axes measurements defined with a centrifugalcomponent (also called the radial component), and a linear spatialtransition component the swing analysis system accurately calculates avariety of golf swing metrics which can be used by the golfer to improvetheir swing. These swing quality metrics include:

-   -   1. Golf club head time varying velocity for a significant time        span before and after maximum velocity of the swing.    -   2. Time varying swing radius for a significant time span before        and after maximum velocity of the swing.    -   3. Golf club head face approach angle of the golf club head,        whether the club face is “open”, “square”, or “closed”, and by        how much measured in degrees, for a significant time span before        and after maximum velocity of the swing.    -   4. Wrist cock angle during the swing, for a significant time        span before and after maximum velocity of the swing.    -   5. Club shaft lag/lead flexing during the swing, for a        significant time span before and after maximum velocity of the        swing.    -   6. Club head toe down angle during the swing, for a significant        time span before and after maximum velocity of the swing.    -   7. Club head acceleration force profile for the backswing that        include time varying vector components and total time duration.    -   8. Club head acceleration force profile for the pause and        reversal segment of the swing after backswing that includes time        varying vector components and total time duration.    -   9. Club head acceleration force profile for the power-stroke        after pause and reversal that includes time varying vector        components and total time duration.    -   10. Club head acceleration force profile for the follow through        after power-stroke that includes time varying vector components        and total time duration.    -   11. Club head swing tempo profile which includes total time        duration of tempo for the backswing, pause and reversal, and        power-stroke and provides a percentage break down of each        segment duration compared to total tempo segment duration.    -   12. All analysis metrics listed above correlated to the spatial        domain.

The module acceleration measurement process comprises sensors that areconnected to electrical analog and digital circuitry and an energystorage unit such as a battery to supply power to the circuits. Thecircuitry conditions the signals from the sensors, samples the signalsfrom all sensors simultaneously, converts them to a digital format,attaches a time stamp to each group of simultaneous sensor measurements,and then stores the data in memory. The process of sampling sensorssimultaneously is sequentially repeated at a fast rate so that allacceleration forces profile points from each sensor are relativelysmooth with respect to time. The minimum sampling rate is the “Nyquistrate” of the highest significant and pertinent frequency domaincomponent of any of the sensors' time domain signal.

The sensor module also contains circuitry for storing measured digitaldata and a method for communicating the measured data out of the moduleto a computational engine integrated with interface peripherals thatinclude a visual display and or audio capabilities. In the preferredembodiment the club head module also contains RF circuitry for instantwireless transmission of sensor data immediately after sampling to a RFreceiver plugged into a USB or any other communications port of a laptopcomputer. The receiver comprises analog and digital circuitry forreceiving RF signals carrying sensor data, demodulating those signals,storing the sensor data in a queue, formatting data into standard USB orother communication formats for transfer of the data to the computationalgorithm operating on the computation engine.

An alternate embodiment of this invention contemplates a similar modulewithout the RF communication circuitry and the addition of significantlymore memory and USB connectivity. This alternate embodiment can storemany swings of data and then at a later time, the module can be pluggeddirectly into to a USB laptop port for analysis of each swing.

Another alternate embodiment of this invention contemplates a similarclub head module without the RF circuitry and with a wired connection toa second module mounted on the shaft of the club near the gripcomprising a computational engine to run computational algorithm and adisplay for conveying golf metrics.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The above and other features of the present invention will become moreapparent upon reading the following detailed description in conjunctionwith the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the present invention embodied with anattached module that contains three acceleration sensors located on athree-dimensional orthogonal coordinate system with axes x_(f), y_(f),and z _(f), where the axes are fixed with respect to the module.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the club head module attached to theclub head and the alignment of the club head module three orthogonalmeasurement axes x_(f), y_(f), and z _(f), to the golf club structure.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the “inertial” motion axes of the clubhead motion x_(cm), y_(cm) and z_(cm) as the golfer swings the club andhow these axes relate to the multi-lever model components of thegolfer's swing.

FIG. 4 shows the multi-lever variable radius model system and two keyinterdependent angles η and α and their relationship between the twocoordinate systems; the measured axes of club head module x_(f), y_(f)and z_(f), and a second coordinate system comprising the inertial motionaxes of club head travel x_(cm), y_(cm) and z_(cm).

FIG. 5 shows the club face angle Φ for different club orientationsreferenced to the club head travel path.

FIG. 6 shows the toe down angle, Ω, and it's reference to the shaft bowstate and measurement axis dynamics.

FIGS. 7 and 7A shows wrist cock angle α_(wc), and the shaft flexlag/lead angle α_(sf) which together sum to the angle α.

FIG. 8 shows the force balance for the multi-lever variable radius swingmodel system and the inter-relationship to both axes systems.

FIG. 9 shows the force balance for the flexible lever portion of themulti-lever model for the toe down angle Ω.

FIG. 10 shows the mounting and alignment process of the club head modulebeing attached to the club head and the available visual alignmentstructure.

FIG. 11 shows the possible club head module mounting angle error A thatis detected and then calibrated out of the raw data.

FIG. 12 shows another club head module mounting angle error that isdetected and then calibrated out of the raw data.

FIG. 13 shows the wireless link between the club head module and the USBreceiving unit plugged into a user interface device being a laptopcomputer.

FIG. 14 shows a wired connection between the club head module and acustom user interface unit attached to the club shaft.

FIGS. 15, 15A,15B, and 15C show the system components and theirelectronic functions respectively for the first embodiment of time spacecorrelation defining a relationship between the measurements time lineand the spatial domain.

FIGS. 16,16A and 16B show the system setup, configuration exampleoptions and operation of the first, second and forth embodiments of thetime space correlation.

FIGS. 17, 17A, 17B and 17C show the system components and theirelectronic functions respectively for the second embodiment of timespace correlation defining a relationship between the measurements timeline and the spatial domain.

FIGS. 18 and 18A show the USB Module 1302 and external antennas and theelectronic functions within the USB Module for the third embodiment ofthe time space correlation defining a relationship between themeasurements time line and the spatial domain.

FIGS. 19, 19A and 19B show the system setup, a configuration exampleoption and operation of the third embodiment of the time spacecorrelation.

FIG. 20 shows the triangle for calculating swing plain angle to theground.

FIGS. 21 and 21A show three points that are used in defining a swingplane for club head travel in different parts of swing

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present invention comprises accelerometers attached to the club headthat allow the motion of the club head during the swing to bedetermined. In the preferred embodiment as shown in FIG. 1 sensors areincorporated in a club head attachable module 101. The module 101 has afront surface 102 and a top surface 103 and an inwardly domed attachmentsurface 107. The sensors in module 101 measure acceleration in threeorthogonal axes which include: the x_(f)-axis 104 that is perpendicularto the front surface 102, the z_(f)-axis 105 that is perpendicular tox_(f)-axis 104 and perpendicular to the top surface 103 and they_(f)-axis 106 that is perpendicular to both the x_(f)-axis 104 and thez_(f)-axis 105.

FIG. 2 shows the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is themodule 101 with three orthogonal measurement axes 104, 105 and 106 thatis attached to the top surface 204 of the club head 201. The club headmodule 101 attachment surface 107 is attached to club head 201 topsurface 204 with a conventional double sided tape with adhesive on topand bottom surfaces (not shown).

For the club head module 101 mounted perfectly on the club head 201 topsurface 204 the following relations are achieved: The z_(f)-axis 105 isaligned so that it is parallel to the club shaft 202. The x_(f)-axis 104is aligned so that is orthogonal to the z_(f)-axis 105 and perpendicularto the plane 203 that would exist if the club face has a zero loftangle. The y_(f)-axis 106 is aligned orthogonally to both the x_(f)-axis104 and z_(f)-axis 105.

With these criteria met, the plane created by the x_(f)-axis 104 and they_(f)-axis 106 is perpendicular to the non-flexed shaft 202. In additionthe plane created by the y_(f)-axis 106 and the z_(f)-axis 105 isparallel to the plane 203 that would exist if the club face has a zeroloft angle.

The mathematical label a_(sx) represents the acceleration force measuredby a sensor along the club head module 101 x_(f)-axis 104. Themathematical label a_(sy) represents the acceleration force measured bya sensor along the club head module 101 y_(f)-axis 106. The mathematicallabel a_(sz) represents the acceleration force measured by a sensoralong the club head module 101 z_(f)-axis 105.

If the club head module of the preferred embodiment is not alignedexactly with the references of the golf club there is an algorithm thatis used to detect and calculated the angle offset from the intendedreferences of the club system and a method to calibrate and correct themeasured data. This algorithm is covered in detail after the analysis isshown for proper club head module attachment with no mounting anglevariations.

Club head motion is much more complicated than just pure linearaccelerations during the swing. It experiences angular rotations of thefixed sensor orthogonal measurement axes, x_(f)-axis 104, y_(f)-axis 106and z_(f)-axis 105 of module 101 around all the center of mass inertialacceleration force axes during the swing, as shown in FIG. 3. As thegolfer 301 swings the golf club 302 and the club head 201 travels on anarc there are inertial center of mass axes along which inertia forcesact on the center of mass of the club head 201. These are thex_(cm)-axis 303, y_(cm)-axis 305 and z_(cm)-axis 304.

The three orthogonal measurement axes x_(f)-axis 104, y_(f)-axis 106 andz_(f)-axis 105 of module 101, along with a physics-based model of themulti-lever action of the swing of the golfer 301, are sufficient todetermine the motion relative to the club head three-dimensional centerof mass axes with the x_(cm)-axis 303, y_(cm)-axis 305 and z_(cm)-axis304.

The mathematical label a_(z) is defined as the acceleration along thez_(cm)-axis 304, the radial direction of the swing, and is the axis ofthe centrifugal force acting on the club head 201 during the swing fromthe shoulder 306 of the golfer 301. It is defined as positive in thedirection away from the golfer 301. The mathematical label a_(x) is thedefined club head acceleration along the x_(cm)-axis 303 that isperpendicular to the a_(z)-axis and points in the direction ofinstantaneous club head inertia on the swing arc travel path 307. Theclub head acceleration is defined as positive when the club head isaccelerating in the direction of club head motion and negative when theclub head is decelerating in the direction of club head motion. Themathematical label a_(y) is defined as the club head acceleration alongthe y_(cm)-axis 305 and is perpendicular to the swing plane 308.

During the golfer's 301 entire swing path 308, the dynamically changingrelationship between the two coordinate systems, defined by the module101 measurements coordinate system axes x_(f)-axis 104, y_(f)-axis 106and z_(f)-axis 105 and the inertial motion acceleration force coordinatesystem axes x_(cm)-axis 303, y_(cm)-axis 305 and z_(cm)-axis 304, mustbe defined. This is done through the constraints of the multi-levermodel partially consisting of the arm lever 309 and the club shaft lever310.

The multi lever system as shown in FIG. 4 shows two interdependentangles defined as angle η 401 which is the angle between the club headmodule 101 z_(f)-axis 105 and the inertial z_(cm)-axis 304 and the angleα 403 which is the sum of wrist cock angle and shaft flex lag/lead angle(shown later in FIGS. 7 and 7A). The angle η 401 is also the club headrotation around the y_(cm)-axis 106 (not shown in FIG. 4 but isperpendicular to the page at the club head center of mass) and is causedlargely by the angle of wrist cock, and to a lesser extent club shaftflexing during the swing. The length of the variable swing radius R 402is a function of the fixed length arm lever 309, the fixed length clubshaft lever 310 and the angle η 401. The angle η 401 can vary greatly,starting at about 40 degrees or larger at the start of the downswing andapproaches zero at club head maximum velocity. The inertial x_(cm)-axis303 is as previously stated perpendicular to the inertial z_(cm)-axis304 and variable radius R 402.

FIG. 5 shows the angle Φ 501 which is the club face angle and is definedas the angle between the plane 502 that is perpendicular to the clubhead travel path 307 and the plane that is defined for zero club faceloft 203. The angle Φ 501 also represents the club head rotation aroundthe z_(f)-axis 105. The angle Φ 501 varies greatly throughout the swingstarting at about 90 degrees or larger at the beginning of the downswingand becomes less positive and perhaps even negative by the end of thedown stroke. When the angle Φ 501 is positive the club face angle issaid to be “OPEN” as shown in club head orientation 503. During an idealswing the angle Φ 501 will be zero or said to be “SQUARE” at the pointof maximum club head velocity as shown in club head orientation 504. Ifthe angle Φ 501 is negative the club face angle is said to be “CLOSED”as shown in club head orientation 505.

FIG. 6 shows angle Ω 601 which is referred to as the toe down angle andis defined as the angle between the top of a club head 201 of a golfclub with a non bowed shaft state 602 and a golf club head 201 of a golfclub with bowed shaft state 603 due to the centrifugal force pulling theclub head toe downward during the swing. The angle Ω is a characteristicof the multi-lever model representing the non rigid club lever. Theangle Ω 601 also represents the club head 201 rotation around thex_(f)-axis 104 (not shown in FIG. 6, but which is perpendicular to they_(f)-axis 106 and z_(f)-axis 105 intersection). The angle Ω 601 startsoff at zero at the beginning of the swing, and approaches a maximumvalue of a few degrees at the maximum club head velocity.

FIGS. 7 and 7A show the angle α 403 which is the sum of angles α_(wc)701, defined as the wrist cock angle, and α_(sf) 702, defined as theshaft flex lag/lead angle. The angle α_(sf) 702 is the angle between anon-flexed shaft 703 and the flexed shaft state 704, both in the swingplane 308 defined in FIG. 3, and is one characteristic of the non rigidlever in the multi-lever model. The shaft leg/lead flex angle α_(sf) 702is caused by a combination of the inertial forces acting on the club andthe wrist torque provided by the golfer's 301 wrists 705 and hands 706on the shaft grip 707.

FIG. 8 shows the force balance for the multi-lever swing system. Theterm a_(v) 805 is the vector sum of a_(x) 804 and a_(z) 803. Theresulting force is given by F_(v)=m_(s)a_(v) where m_(s) is the mass ofthe club head system. The term F_(v) 806 is also, from the forcebalance, the vector sum of the tensile force, F_(t) 807, in the shaftdue to the shoulder torque 801, and F_(wt) 808, due to wrist torque 802.The angle between force vector F_(v) 806 and the swing radius, R 402, isthe sum of the angles η 401 and η_(wt) 809.

There are several ways to treat the rotation of one axes frame relativeto another, such as the use of rotation matrices. The approach describedbelow is chosen because it is intuitive and easily understandable, butother approaches with those familiar with the art would fall under thescope of this invention.

Using the multi-lever model using levers, rigid and non-rigid, therotation angles describing the orientation relationship between themodule measured axis coordinate system and the inertial accelerationforce axes coordinate system can be determined from the sensors in theclub head module 101 through the following relationships:a _(sx) =a _(x) cos(Φ)cos(η)−a _(y) sin(Φ)−a _(z) cos(Φ)sin(η)  1.a _(sy) =a _(x) sin(Φ)cos(η)+a _(y) cos(Φ)+a_(z)(sin(Ω)−sin(Φ)sin(η)),  2.a _(sz) =a _(x) sin(η)−a _(y) sin(Ω)cos(Φ)+a _(z) cos(η)  3.The following is a reiteration of the mathematical labels for the aboveequations.

-   -   a_(x) is the club head acceleration in the x_(cm)-axis 303        direction.    -   a_(y) is the club head acceleration in the y_(cm)-axis 305        direction.    -   a_(z) is the club head acceleration in the z_(cm)-axis 304        direction.    -   a_(sx) is the acceleration value returned by the club head        module 101 sensor along the x_(f)-axis 104.    -   a_(sy) is the acceleration value returned by the club head        module 101 sensor along the y_(f)-axis 106.    -   a_(sz) is the acceleration value returned by the club head        module 101 sensor along the z_(f)-axis 105.        During a normal golf swing with a flat swing plane 308, a_(y)        will be zero, allowing the equations to be simplified:        a _(sx) =a _(x) cos(Φ)cos(η)−a _(z) cos(Φ)sin(η)  4.        a _(sy) =a _(x) sin(Φ)cos(η)+a _(z)(sin(Ω)−sin(Φ)sin(η))  5.        a _(sz) =a _(x) sin(η)+a _(z) cos(η)  6.        These equations are valid for a “free swing” where there is no        contact with the golf ball.

The only known values in the above are a_(sx), a_(sy), and a_(sz) fromthe three sensors. The three angles are all unknown. It will be shownbelow that a_(x) and a_(z) are related, leaving only one unknownacceleration. However, that still leaves four unknowns to solve for withonly three equations. The only way to achieve a solution is through anunderstanding the physics of the multi-lever variable radius swingsystem dynamics and choosing precise points in the swing where physicsgoverned relationships between specific variables can be used.

The angle Φ 501, also known as the club face approach angle, varies atleast by 180 degrees throughout the backswing, downswing, and followthrough. Ideally it is zero at maximum velocity, but a positive valuewill result in an “open” clubface and negative values will result in a“closed” face. The angle Φ 501 is at the control of the golfer and theresulting swing mechanics, and is not dependent on either a_(x) ora_(z). However, it can not be known a-priori, as it depends entirely onthe initial angle of rotation around the shaft when the golfer grips theshaft handle and the angular rotational velocity of angle Φ 501 duringthe golfer's swing.

The angle Ω 601, on the other hand, is dependent on a_(z), where theradial acceleration causes a centrifugal force acting on the center ofmass of the club head, rotating the club head down around the x_(f)-axisinto a “toe” down position of several degrees. Therefore, angle Ω 601 isa function of a_(z). This function can be derived from a physicsanalysis to eliminate another unknown from the equations.

The angle η 401 results from both club shaft angle 702 lag/lead duringthe downswing and wrist cock angle 701. Wrist cock angle is due both tothe mechanics and geometry relationships of the multi lever swing modelas shown in FIG. 4 and the amount of torque exerted by the wrists andhands on the shaft.

Before examining the specifics of these angles, it is worth looking atthe general behavior of equations (4) through (6). If both angle Ω 601and angle η 401 were always zero, which is equivalent to the model usedby Hammond in U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,646, the swing mechanics reduces to asingle lever constant radius model. For this case:a _(sx) =a _(x) cos(Φ)  7.a _(sy) =a _(x) sin(Φ)  8.a _(sz) =a _(z)  9.This has the simple solution for club face angle Φ of:

10. ${\tan(\Phi)} = \frac{a_{sy}}{a_{sx}}$

In Hammond's U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,646 he states in column 4 starting inline 10 “By computing the vector angle from the acceleration measured byaccelerometers 12 and 13, the position of the club face 11 at anyinstant in time during the swing can be determined.” As a result ofHammond using a single lever constant radius model which results inequation 10 above, it is obvious he failed to contemplate effects of thecentrifugal force components on sensor 12 and sensor 13 of his patent.The large error effects of this can be understood by the fact that thea_(z) centrifugal acceleration force is typically 50 times or moregreater than the measured acceleration forces of a_(sx) and a_(sy) forthe last third of the down swing and first third of the follow through.Therefore, even a small angle Ω 601 causing an a_(z) component to berotated onto the measured a_(sy) creates enormous errors in the singlelever golf swing model.

In addition, the effect of the angle η 401 in the multi lever variableradius swing model is to introduce a_(z) components into a_(sx) anda_(sy), and an a_(x) component into a_(sz). The angle η 401 can varyfrom a large value at the start and midpoint of the down stroke whena_(z) is growing from zero. In later portion of the down stroke a_(z)becomes very large as angle η 401 tends towards zero at maximumvelocity. Also, as mentioned above, the angle η 401 introduces an a_(x)component into a_(sz). This component will be negligible at the point ofmaximum club head velocity where angle η 401 approaches zero, but willbe significant in the earlier part of the swing where angle η 401 islarge and the value of a_(x) is larger than that for a_(z).

The cos(η) term in equations (4) and (5) is the projection of a_(x) ontothe x_(f)-y_(f) plane, which is then projected onto the x_(f) axis 104and the y_(f) axis 106. These projections result in the a_(x)cos(Φ)cos(η) and a_(x) sin(Φ)cos(η) terms respectively in equations (4)and (5). The projection of a_(x) onto the z_(f)-axis 105 is given by thea_(x) sin(η) term in equation (6).

The sin(η) terms in equations (4) and (5) are the projection of a_(z)onto the plane defined by x_(f) axis 104 and the y_(f) axis 106, whichis then projected onto the x_(f) axis 104 and y_(f) axis 106 through thea_(z) cos(Φ)sin(η) and a_(z) sin(Φ)sin(η) terms respectively inequations (4) and (5). The projection of a_(z) onto the z_(f)-axis 105is given by the a_(z) cos(η) term in equation (6).

The angle Ω 601 introduces yet another component of a_(z) into a_(sy).The angle Ω 601 reaches a maximum value of only a few degrees at thepoint of maximum club head velocity, so its main contribution will be atthis point in the swing. Since angle Ω 601 is around the x_(f)-axis 104,it makes no contribution to a_(sx), so its main effect is the a_(z)sin(Ω) projection onto the y_(f)-axis 106 of equation (5). Equations (4)and (5) can be simplified by re-writing as:a _(sx)=(a _(x) cos(η)−a _(z) sin(η))cos(Φ)=f(η)cos(Φ) and  11.a _(sy)=(a _(x) cos(η)−a _(z) sin(η))sin(Φ)+a _(z) sin(Ω)=f(η)sin(Φ)+a_(z) sin(Ω) where  12.f(η)=a _(x) cos(η)−a _(z) sin(η). From (11):  13.

14.${f(\eta)} = {\frac{a_{sx}}{\cos(\Phi)}\mspace{14mu}{which}\mspace{14mu}{when}\mspace{14mu}{inserted}\mspace{14mu}{into}\mspace{14mu}(12)\mspace{14mu}{{obtains}:}}$a _(sy) =a _(sx) tan(Φ)+a _(z) sin(Ω)  15.

From equation (15) it is seen that the simple relationship betweena_(sx) and a_(sy) of equation (10) is modified by the addition of thea_(z) term above. Equations (4) and (6) are re-written as:

${16.\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} = {\frac{a_{sx}}{{\cos(\eta)}{\cos(\Phi)}} + \frac{a_{z}{\sin(\eta)}}{\cos(\eta)}}$

${17.\mspace{14mu} a_{z}} = {\frac{a_{sz}}{\cos(\eta)} - {\frac{a_{x}{\sin(\eta)}}{\cos(\eta)}.}}$These equations are simply solved by substitution to yield:

${18.\mspace{14mu} a_{z}} = {{a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}} - {a_{sx}{\frac{\sin(\eta)}{\cos(\Phi)}.}}}$

${19.\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} = {{a_{sz}{\sin(\eta)}} + {a_{sx}{\frac{\cos(\eta)}{\cos(\Phi)}.}}}$

Equation (19) can be used to find an equation for sin(η) byre-arranging, squaring both sides, and using the identity,cos²(η)=1−sin²(η), to yield a quadratic equation for sin(η), with thesolution:

${20.\mspace{14mu}{\sin(\eta)}} = {\frac{{a_{x}a_{sz}} + {\frac{a_{sx}^{2}}{\cos^{2}(\Phi)}\sqrt{1 - {{\cos^{2}(\Phi)}\left( \frac{a_{sz}^{2} - a_{x}^{2}}{a_{sx}^{2}} \right)}}}}{a_{sz}^{2} + \frac{a_{sx}^{2}}{\cos^{2}(\Phi)}}.}$

To get any further for a solution of the three angles, it is necessaryto examine the physical cause of each. As discussed above the angle η401 can be found from an analysis of the angle α 403, which is the sumof the angles α_(wc) 701, due to wrist cock and α_(sf) 702 due to shaftflex lag or lead.

Angle α 403, and angle η 401 are shown in FIG. 4 in relationship tovariable swing radius R 402, fixed length arm lever A 309, and fixedlength club shaft lever C 310. The mathematical equations relating thesegeometric components are:R ² =A ² +C ²+2AC cos(α)  21.A ² =R ² +C ²−2RC cos(η)  22.Using R² from equation (21) in (22) yields a simple relationship betweenα and η:α=cos⁻¹((R cos(η)−C)/A)23.The swing radius, R 402, can be expressed either in terms of cos(α) orcos(η). Equation (21) provides R directly to be:R=√{square root over (C ² +A ²+2AC cos(α))}.  24.Equation (22) is a quadratic for R which is solved to be:R=C cos(η)+√{square root over (C ²(cos(η)−1)+A ²)}.  25.Both α 403 and η 401 tend to zero at maximum velocity, for whichR_(m)=A+C.

The solutions for the accelerations experienced by the club head as ittravels with increasing velocity on this swing arc defined by equation(25) are:

${26.\mspace{14mu} a_{z}} = {\frac{V_{\Gamma}^{2}}{R} - \frac{\mathbb{d}V_{R}}{\mathbb{d}t}}$

${27.\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} = {{\frac{2}{R}V_{R}V_{\Gamma}} + {R\frac{\mathbb{d}}{\mathbb{d}t}\left( \frac{V_{\Gamma}}{R} \right)}}$The acceleration a_(z) is parallel with the direction of R 402, anda_(x) is perpendicular to it in the swing plane 308. The term V_(Γ) isthe velocity perpendicular to R 402 in the swing plane 308, where Γ isthe swing angle measured with respect to the value zero at maximumvelocity. The term V_(R) is the velocity along the direction of R 402and is given by dR/dt. The swing geometry makes it reasonablystraightforward to solve for both V_(R) and its time derivative, and itwill be shown that a_(z) can also be solved for which then allows asolution for V_(Γ):

${28.\mspace{14mu} V_{\Gamma}} = \sqrt{{Ra}_{z} + {R\frac{\mathbb{d}V_{r}}{\mathbb{d}t}}}$Now define:

${29.\mspace{14mu} a_{z - {radial}}} = \frac{V_{\Gamma}^{2}}{R}$so that:V _(Γ)=√{square root over (Rα _(Z-radial))},  30.Next define:

${{31.\mspace{14mu} a_{ch}} = {\frac{\mathbb{d}{V_{\Gamma}(t)}}{\mathbb{d}t} = \frac{\Delta\;{V_{\Gamma}(t)}}{\Delta\; t}}},$Because (31) has the variable R 402 included as part of the timederivative equation (27) can be written:

${32.\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} = {a_{ch} + {\frac{2}{R}V_{R}V_{\Gamma}}}$Also equation (26) can be written:

${33.\mspace{14mu} a_{z}} = {a_{z - {radial}} - \frac{\mathbb{d}V_{R}}{\mathbb{d}t}}$The acceleration a_(v) 805 is the vector sum of a_(x) 804 and a_(z) 803with magnitude:

${34.\mspace{14mu} a_{v}} = {\sqrt{a_{x}^{2} + a_{z}^{2}} = {\frac{a_{x}}{\sin(\beta)} = \frac{a_{z}}{\cos(\beta)}}}$where

${35.\mspace{14mu}\beta} = {\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{a_{x}}{a_{z}} \right)}$The resulting magnitude of the force acting on the club head is then:F _(v) =m _(s) a _(v)  36.FIG. 8 shows this force balance for F_(v) 806. If there is no forceF_(wt) 808 acting on the golf club head due to torque 802 provided bythe wrists, then F_(v) 806 is just F_(t) 807 along the direction of theshaft, and is due entirely by the arms pulling on the shaft due toshoulder torque 801. For this case it is seen that:β=η for no wrist torque.  37.On the other hand, when force F_(wt) 808 is applied due to wrist torque802:β=η+η+η_(wt) where:  38.F _(wt) =F _(v) sin(η_(wt)).  39.The angle η_(wt) 809 is due to wrist torque 802. From (38):

${40.\mspace{14mu}\eta} = {{\left( {1 - \frac{\eta_{wt}}{\beta}} \right)\beta} = {C_{\eta}\beta}}$where C_(η)<1 is a curve fitting parameter to match the data, and isnominally around the range of 0.75 to 0.85. From the fitted value:η_(wt)=(1−C _(η))β  41.Using (41) in (39) determines the force F_(wt) 808 due to wrist torque802.

To solve for angle Ω 601 as previously defined in FIG. 6 the forcebalance shown in FIG. 9 is applied to accurately determine the toe downangle Ω 601. A torque 901 acting on club head 201 with mass M isgenerated by the acceleration vector 902 on the z_(cm)-axis 304 withmagnitude a_(z) acting through the club head 201 center of mass 903. Thecenter of mass 903 is a distance 904 from the center axis 905 of clubshaft 202 with length C 310 and stiffness constant K. The mathematicallabel for distance 904 is d. Solving the force balance with theconstraints of a flexible shaft K gives an expression for Ω 601:

42.$\Omega = {\frac{{dC}_{\Omega}}{C}\left( \frac{\frac{{Ma}_{z}}{KC}}{1 + \frac{{Ma}_{z}}{KC}} \right)}$

It is worth noting that from equation (42) for increasing values ofa_(z) there is a maximum angle Ω 601 that can be achieved of d C_(Ω)/Cwhich for a typical large head driver is around 4 degrees. The termC_(Ω) is a curve fit parameter to account for variable shaft stiffnessprofiles for a given K. In other words different shafts can have anoverall stiffness constant that is equal, however, the segmentedstiffness profile of the shaft can vary along the taper of the shaft.

An equation for angle Φ 501 in terms of angle Ω 601 can now be found.This is done by first using equation (17) for a_(z) in equation (15):

43.$a_{sy} = {{a_{sx}\frac{\sin(\Phi)}{\cos(\Phi)}} + {a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}{\sin(\Omega)}} - {a_{sx}\frac{{\sin(\eta)}{\sin(\Omega)}}{\cos(\Phi)}}}$Re-arranging terms:(a _(sy) −a _(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω))cos(Φ)=a _(sx) sin(Φ)−a _(sx)sin(η)sin(Ω)  44.Squaring both sides, and using the identity cos²(Φ)=1−sin²(Φ) yields aquadratic equation for sin(Φ):sin²(Φ)[a _(sx) ²+(a _(sy) −a _(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω))²]−2a _(sx) ²sin(Φ)sin(η)sin(Ω)+a _(sx) ²(sin(η)sin(Ω))²−(a _(sy) −a _(sz)cos(η)sin(Ω))²=0  45.Equation (45) has the solution:

46.${\sin(\Phi)} = {\frac{1}{2b_{1}}\left\lbrack {{- b_{2}} + \sqrt{b_{2}^{2} - {4b_{1}b_{3}}}} \right\rbrack}$where the terms in (46) are:b ₁ =a _(sx) ²+(a _(sy) −a _(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω))²b ₂=−2a _(sx) ² sin(η)sin(Ω)b ₃ =a _(sx) ²(sin(η)sin(Ω))²−(a _(sy) −a _(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω))²Equations (42) for Ω 601, (46) for Φ 501, and (20) for η 401 need to besolved either numerically or iteratively using equations (32) for a_(x),(33) for a_(z), and (25) for R 402. This task is extremely complex.However, some innovative approximations can yield excellent results withmuch reduced complexity. One such approach is to look at the end of thepower-stroke segment of the swing where V_(R) and its time derivative goto zero, for which from equations (32), (33), (35) and (40):

47.$\eta = {C_{\eta}{\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{a_{ch}}{a_{z - {radial}}} \right)}}$In this part of the swing the a_(sx) term will be much smaller than thea_(sz) term and equation (18) can be approximated by:a _(z) =a _(z-radial) =a _(sz) cos(η).  48.During the earlier part of the swing, the curve fit coefficient C_(η)would accommodate non-zero values of V_(R) and its time derivative aswell as the force due to wrist torque 802.

The maximum value of η 401 is nominally around 40 degrees for which from(48) a_(ch)/a_(z-radial)=1.34 with C_(η)=0.75. So equation (47) is validfor the range from a_(ch)=0 to a_(ch)=1.34 a_(z-radial), which is abouta third of the way into the down-stroke portion of the swing. At themaximum value of η 401 the vector a_(v) 805 is 13 degrees, or 0.23radians, off alignment with the z_(f) axis and its projection onto thez_(f) axis 105 is a_(sz)=a_(v) cos(0.23)=0.97a_(v). Therefore, thisresults in a maximum error for the expression (48) fora_(z)=a_(z-radial) of only 3%. This amount of error is the result ofignoring the a_(sx) term in equation (18). This physically means thatfor a_(z) in this part of the swing the a_(z-radial) component valuedominates that of the a_(sx) component value. Equation (47) can not beblindly applied without first considering the implications for thefunction ƒ(η) defined by equations (13) and (14), which has a functionaldependence on cos(Φ) through the a_(sx) term, which will not be presentwhen (47) is used in (13). Therefore, this cos(Φ) dependence must beexplicitly included when using (47) to calculate (13) in equation (12)for a_(sy), resulting in:a _(sy)=(a _(x) cos(η)−a _(z) sin(η))tan(Φ)+a _(z) sin(Ω).  49.Equation (49) is applicable only when equation (47) is used for theangle η 401.

A preferred embodiment is next described that uses the simplifyingequations of (47) through (49) to extract results for Φ 501 and η 401using (42) as a model for Ω 601. It also demonstrates how the wrist cockangle α_(wc) 701 and shaft flex angle α_(sf) 702 can be extracted, aswell as the mounting angle errors of the accelerometer module. Althoughthis is the preferred approach, other approaches fall under the scope ofthis invention.

The starting point is re-writing the equations in the following formusing the approximations a_(z-)=a_(z-radial) and a_(x)=a_(ch). Asdiscussed above these are excellent approximations in the later part ofthe swing. Re-writing the equations (4) and (49) with these termsyields:a _(sx) =a _(ch) cos(Φ)cos(η)−a _(z-radial) cos(Φ)sin(η)  50.a _(sy) =a _(ch) tan(Φ)cos(η)+a _(z-radial) sin(Ω)−a _(z-radial)tan(Φ)sin(η)  51.a _(z-radial) =a _(sz) cos(η)  52.Simplifying equation (31):

53. $a_{ch} = \frac{\mathbb{d}V}{\mathbb{d}t}$In this approximation V=V_(Γ) is the club head velocity and dt is thetime increment between sensor data points. The instantaneous velocity ofthe club head traveling on an arc with radius R is from equation (29):V=√{square root over (a _(z-radial) R)}=a _(z-radial) ^(1/2) R ^(1/2)for which:  54.

55.$a_{ch} = {\frac{\mathbb{d}V}{\mathbb{d}t} = {\frac{1}{2}\left( {{\frac{1}{R}\frac{\mathbb{d}R}{\mathbb{d}t}} + {\frac{1}{a_{z - {radial}}}\frac{\mathbb{d}a_{z - {radial}}}{\mathbb{d}t}}} \right)\sqrt{{Ra}_{z - {radial}}}}}$Using equation (52) for a_(z-radial) in (55):

56.$a_{ch} = {\frac{1}{2}\left( {{\frac{1}{R}\frac{\mathbb{d}R}{\mathbb{d}t}} + {\frac{1}{a_{sz}}\frac{\mathbb{d}a_{sz}}{\mathbb{d}t}} - {{\tan(\eta)}\frac{\mathbb{d}\eta}{\mathbb{d}t}}} \right)\sqrt{{Ra}_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}}}$During the early part of the downswing, all the derivative terms willcontribute to a_(ch), but in the later part of the downswing when R isreaching its maximum value, R_(max), and η is approaching zero, thedominant term by far is the da_(sz)/dt term, which allows thesimplification for this part of the swing:

57.$a_{ch} = {\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{1}{a_{sz}}\frac{\mathbb{d}a_{sz}}{\mathbb{d}t}} \right)\sqrt{{Ra}_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}}}$With discreet sensor data taken at time intervals Δt, the equivalent ofthe above is:

58.$a_{ch} = {\frac{\sqrt{R\;{\cos(\eta)}}}{\Delta\; t}\left( \sqrt{{a_{sz}\left( t_{n} \right)} - {a_{sz}\left( t_{n - 1} \right)}} \right)}$It is convenient to define the behavior for a_(ch) for the case whereR=R_(max) and η=0, so that from equation (52) a_(z-radial)=a_(sz), whichdefines:

59.$a_{chsz} = {\frac{\sqrt{R_{\max}}}{\Delta\; t}\left( \sqrt{{a_{sz}\left( t_{n} \right)} - {a_{sz}\left( t_{n - 1} \right)}} \right)}$Then the inertial spatial translation acceleration component of the clubhead is:

60. $a_{ch} = {a_{chsz}\frac{\sqrt{R\;{\cos(\eta)}}}{\sqrt{R_{\max}}}}$Substituting equation (52) and (60) back into equations (50) and (51) wehave the equations containing all golf swing metric angles assuming nomodule mounting angle errors in terms of direct measured sensor outputs:a _(sx) =a _(chsz)(√{square root over (R cos(η))}/√{square root over (R_(Max))})cos(Φ)cos(η)−a _(sz) cos(η)cos(Φ)sin(η)  61.a _(sy) =a _(chsz)(√{square root over (R cos(η))}/√{square root over (R_(Max))})tan(Φ)cos(η)+a _(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω)−a _(sz)cos(η)tan(Φ)sin(η)  62.Using equation (62) to solve for Φ, since this is the only equation thatcontains both η and Ω, yields:

63.${\tan(\Phi)} = \frac{a_{sy} - {a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}{\sin(\Omega)}}}{{{a_{chsz}\left( {\sqrt{R\;{\cos(\eta)}}/\sqrt{R_{Max}}} \right)}{\cos(\eta)}} - {a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}{\sin(\eta)}}}$

Now there are two equations with three unknowns. However, one of theunknowns, η, has the curve fit parameter C_(η) that can be iterativelydetermined to give best results for continuity of the resulting timevarying curves for each of the system variables. Also, there areboundary conditions from the multi-lever model of the swing that areapplied, to specifics points and areas of the golf swing, such as thepoint of maximum club head velocity at the end of the downstroke, where:

-   -   1. For a golf swing approaching max velocity the value of η        approaches zero,    -   2. Ω is at a maximum value when centrifugal force is highest,        which occurs at maximum velocity.    -   3. The club face angle, Φ, can vary greatly at maximum club head        velocity. However, regardless of the angle at maximum velocity        the angle is changing at a virtual constant rate just before and        after the point of maximum club head velocity.        This knowledge allows for all equations to be solved, through an        interactive process using starting points for the curve fit        parameters.

The angle Ω 601 is a function of a_(sz) through equations (42), (48) and(52). The curve fit constant, C_(Ω), is required since different shaftscan have an overall stiffness constant that is equal, however, thesegmented stiffness profile of the shaft can vary along the taper of theshaft. The value of C_(Ω) will be very close to one, typically less than1/10 of a percent variation for the condition of no module mountingangle error from the intended alignment. Values of C_(Ω) greater or lessthan 1/10 of a percent indicates a module mounting error angle along they_(cm)-axis which will be discussed later. Re-writing equation (42)using (52):

64.$\Omega = \frac{C_{\Omega}d\; m_{s}a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}}{C\left( {{KC} + {m_{s}a_{sz}{\cos(\eta)}}} \right)}$The constants in equation (64) are:

-   -   C_(Ω) Multiplying curve fit factor applied for iterative        solution    -   d Distance from housel to center of gravity (COG) of club head    -   m_(s) mass of club head system, including club head and Club        Head Module    -   a_(sz) The measured z_(f)-axis 105 acceleration force value    -   K Stiffness coefficient of shaft supplied by the golfer or which        can Be determined in the calibration process associated with the        user profile entry section of the analysis program    -   C Club length        The angle η 401 is found from equation (47):

65.$\eta = {C_{\eta}{\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{a_{ch}}{a_{z - {radial}}} \right)}}$The curve fit parameter, C_(η), has an initial value of 0.75.

An iterative solution process is used to solve equations (61), (63), and(64), using (65) for η 401, which has the following defined steps forthe discreet data tables obtained by the sensors:

-   -   1. Determine from sample points of a_(sz) the zero crossing        position of a_(chsz). This is the point where the club head        acceleration is zero and therefore the maximum velocity is        achieved. Because the samples are digitized quantities at        discrete time increments there will be two sample points, where        a_(chsz) has a positive value and an adjacent sample point where        a_(chsz) has a negative value.    -   2. Course tune of Ω 601: Use initial approximation values to        solve for the numerator of tan(Φ) of equation (63) with respect        to the sample point where a_(ch) passes through zero:        -   a. Numerator of tan(Φ)={a_(sy)−a_(sz) cos(η)sin(Ω)}        -   b. The numerator of tan(Φ) in equation 63 represents the            measured value of a_(sy) minus a_(z-radial) components            resulting from angle Ω with the following conditions at            maximum velocity:        -   i. Toe down angle Ω, which is at its maximum value at            maximum club head velocity, where maximum a_(sz) is achieved            at η=0, for which a_(sz)=a_(z-radial) From equation (52).        -   ii. Angle η 401, which is a function of wrist cock and shaft            flex lag/lead, is zero when maximum velocity is reached and            a_(ch) is zero.        -   c. Use the multiplying constant C_(Ω) to adjust the Ω 601            equation so that the tan(Φ) numerator function sample point            value, equivalent to the first negative sample point value            of a_(ch), is set to the value zero.    -   3. Use new course tune value for the Q 601 function to calculate        Φ 501 from equation (63) for all sample points.    -   4. Next, fine tune the multiplying constant C_(Ω) of the Ω 601        function by evaluating the slope of Φ 501, for the point pairs        before, through, and after maximum velocity.        -   a. Examine sample point pairs of the total tan(Φ) function            given by equation (63) before maximum velocity, through            maximum velocity, and after maximum velocity, evaluating            slope variation across sample pairs.        -   b. Evaluate sequential slope point pairs comparing slopes to            determine a variation metric.        -   c. Tune multiplying constant C_(Ω) of Ω 601 function in very            small increments until the slope of Φ 501 of all sample            point pairs are equivalent.        -   d. Now the value of the Ω function is defined but the value            of η is still given with the initial value of C_(η)=0.75.            Therefore, even though the value of Φ 501 is exact for            values very near max velocity where η 401 approaches zero,            values of Φ 501 are only approximations away from maximum            velocity since Φ 501 is a function of η 401, which at this            point is limited by the initial approximation.    -   5. Calculate all sample points for the for the following        functions:        -   a. The fine tuned function Ω 601        -   b. Approximate function η 401 with C_(η)=0.75.        -   c. Function Φ 501 from equation (63)        -   i. Which will be exact for sample points close to maximum            velocity        -   ii. Which will be an approximation for the sample points            away from max velocity because the function η 401 is still            an approximate function.    -   6. Tune the multiplying curve fit constant C_(η) of the η 401        function using equation (61). This is done by rewriting        equation (61) into a form which allows the comparison of a_(sx)        minus the a_(sz) components which must be equal to a_(chsz). The        evaluation equation is from (61):        -   a . . .            {a _(sx) +a _(sz) cos(η)cos(φ)sin(η)}/{cos(φ)cos(η)}=a            _(chsz)(√{square root over (R cos(η))}/√{square root over (R            _(Max))})        -   b. If everything were exact, the two sides of this equation            would be equal. If not, they will differ by the variance:            Variance={a _(sx) +a _(sz)            cos(η)cos(φ)sin(η)}/{cos(φ)cos(η)}−a _(chsz)(√{square root            over (R cos(η))}/√{square root over (R _(Max))})        -   c. This variance metric is summed across a significant            number of sample points before and after maximum velocity            for each small increment that C_(η) is adjusted.        -   d. The minimum summed variance metric set defines the value            of the constant C_(η) for the η 401 function.    -   7. Compare the value of C_(η) obtained at the conclusion of the        above sequence with the starting value of C_(η), and if the        difference is greater than 0.1 repeat steps 3 through 7 where        the initial value for C_(η) in step 3 is the last iterated value        from step 6.d. When the difference is less than 0.1, the final        value of C_(η) has been obtained.    -   8. Angle α 403 is now solved from equation (23) with η 401        across all sample points:        α=cos⁻¹((R cos(η)−C)/A)        -   a. α 403 represents the sum of wrist cock angle and shaft            flex lag/lead angle as defined by α=α_(wc)+α_(sf).        -   b. In a standard golf swing the wrist cock angle is a            decreasing angle at a constant rate during the down stroke            to maximum club head velocity. Therefore, the angle can be            approximated as a straight line from the point where wrist            cock unwind is initiated.        -   c. The slope of the angle α_(wc) 701 is:        -   i. [α_(wc) (at wrist cock unwind initiation)−α_(wc) (club            head max Velocity)]/ΔT, where ΔT is the time duration for            this occurrence.        -   d. Since α_(wc) 701 goes to zero at the point of maximum            velocity and the time duration ΔT is known, the function of            angle α_(we) 701 is now defined.    -   9. The shaft flex angle α_(sf) 702 is now defined as        α_(sf)=α−α_(wc) for all sample points during down stroke. Any        deviation from the straight line function of α_(wc) 701 is due        to shaft flex.        The iterative analysis solution described above is based on the        club head module being mounted so that the x_(f)-axis 104,        y_(f)-axis 106, and z_(f)-axis 105 associated with the club head        module 101 are aligned correctly with the golf club structural        alignment elements as previously described in FIG. 2.

Since the module 101 attaches to the top of the club head 201, which isa non-symmetric complex domed surface, the mounting of the club headmodule 101 is prone to variation in alignment of the x_(f)-axis 104,z_(f)-axis 105, and y_(f)-axis 106 with respect to the golf clubreference structures described in FIG. 2.

During mounting of the club head module 101, as shown in FIG. 10, thefront surface 102 of the club head module 101 can easily be aligned withthe club face/club head top surface seam 1002. This alignment results inthe y_(f)-axis 106 being parallel to the plane 203 which is the planecreated if the club face has zero loft. Using this as the only alignmentreference for attaching the club head module 101 to the club head 201,two degrees of freedom still exist that can contribute to club module101 mounting angle errors. The module 101 mount angle errors can bedescribed with two angles resulting from the following conditions:

-   -   1. The module 101 being mounted a greater distance away or        closer to the club face seam 1002 causing an angle rotation        around the y_(f)-axis 106 causing the x_(f)-axis 104 and        z_(f)-axis 105 to be misaligned with their intended club        structure references. The mathematical label that describes this        angle of rotation is λ 1103 (as shown in FIG. 11).    -   2. The module 101 being mounted closer to or farther away from        the club shaft 202 causing an angle rotation around the        x_(f)-axis 104 causing the y_(f)-axis 106 and the z_(f)-axis 105        to be misaligned with the intended club structure references.        The mathematical label that describes this angle of rotation is        κ 1201 (as shown in FIG. 12).

The issue of mounting angle variation is most prevalent with the clubhead module 101 being rotated around the y_(f)-axis. As shown in FIG.11, the club head module 101 is mounted with the x_(f)-axis 104 parallelto the plane 1101 that is defined as perpendicular to the shaft axis1102. With this condition met the angle value λ=0 1103 indicates norotation around the y_(f)-axis 106 (not shown but is perpendicular todrawing surface). As shown in FIG. 11A, the club head module 101 ismounted closer to the club face seam 1002 causing a negative value forthe angle λ 1103 between the plane 1101 and the x_(f)-axis 104. As shownin FIG. 11B, the club head module 101 is mounted further from the seam1002 resulting in a positive value for the angle λ 1103 between theplane 1101 and the x_(f)-axis 104. On a typical club head, and dependingon how far back or forward on the club head dome the module 101 ismounted, the mounting error angle λ 1103 typically varies between −1degrees and +6 degrees. This angle creates a small rotation around they_(f)-axis 106 resulting in a misalignment of the x_(f)-axis 104 andalso the z_(f)-axis 105. This mounting error can be experimentallydetermined using a standard golf swing.

For a linear acceleration path the relationship between trueacceleration and that of the misaligned measured value of a_(sx) isgiven by the following equations where a_(sx-true) is defined as whatthe measured data would be along the x_(f)-axis 104 with λ=0 1103degrees. A similar definition holds for a_(sz-true) along the z_(f) axis105. Then:a _(sx-true) =a _(sx)/cos(λ)  66.a _(sz-true) =a _(sz)/cos(λ)  67.However, the travel path 307 is not linear for a golf swing whichcreates a radial component due to the fixed orientation error betweenthe offset module measurement coordinate system and the properly alignedmodule measurement coordinate system. As a result, any misalignment ofthe club head module axis by angle λ creates an a_(z-radial) componentas measured by the misaligned x_(f)-axis 104. The a_(z-radial) componentcontributes to the a_(sx) measurement in the following manner:a _(sx) =a _(sx-true) +a _(sz) sin(λ)  68.The angle λ 1103 is constant in relation to the club structure, makingthe relationship above constant, or always true, for the entire swing.The detection and calibrating correction process of the mountingvariation angle λ 1103 is determined by examining equations (50) and(53) at the point of maximum velocity where by definition:

-   -   η goes to zero    -   a_(ch) goes to zero        Therefore, at maximum velocity a_(sx-true) must also go to zero.        At maximum velocity:        a _(sx-true) =a _(sx) −a _(sz) sin(λ)=0  69.

70. $\lambda = {\sin^{- 1}\left( \frac{a_{sx}}{a_{sz}} \right)}$Now the measured data arrays for both the affected measurement axisx_(f)-axis 104 and z_(f)-axis 105 must be updated with calibrated dataarrays.a _(sx-cal) =a _(sx) −a _(sz) sin λ  71.a _(sz-cal) =a _(sz)/cos λ  72.The new calibrated data arrays a_(sx-cal) and a_(sz-cal) are now usedand replaces all a_(sx) and a_(sz) values in previous equations whichcompletes the detection and calibration of club head module mountingerrors due to a error rotation around the y_(r)-axis 106.

Now the final detection and calibration of the club head module 101mounting error angle κ 1201 around the x_(f)-axis 104 can be done. Asshown in FIG. 12, the angle κ 1201 is zero when the club head module 101is perfectly mounted, defined as when the club head module 101 axisy_(f)-axis 106 is parallel with the plane 1101, that is perpendicular tothe shaft axis 1102. As shown in FIG. 12A when the club head module 101is mounted closer to the shaft the y_(f)-axis 106 intersects the plane1101 creating a negative value for the angle κ 1201. As shown in FIG.12B the angle κ 1201 is a positive value resulting from the intersectionof the y_(f)-axis 106 and the plane 1101 when the module 101 is mountedfurther away from the shaft.

The detection of mounting error angle κ 1201 is achieved by evaluatingC_(Ω) resulting from the iterative solution steps 2 though 4 describedearlier. If C_(Ω) is not very close or equal to one, then there is anadditional a_(z)-radial contribution to a_(sy) from mounting error angleκ 1201. The magnitude of mounting error angle κ 1201 is determined byevaluating Ω 601 at maximum velocity from equation (64) where for nomounting error C_(Ω)=1. Then the mounting angle κ 1201 is determined by:κ=(C _(Ω)−1)(dm _(s) a _(sz) cos(κ))/(C(KC+m _(s) a _(sz) cos(η)))  73.As previously described for mounting angle error λ, the mounting errorangle κ 1201 affects the two measurement sensors along the y_(f)-axis106 and the z_(f)-axis 105. Consistent with the radial component errorsresulting from the λ 1201 mounting angle error, the κ 1201 mountingangle error is under the same constraints. Therefore:a _(sy-cal) =a _(sy) −a _(sz) sin(κ)  74.a _(sz-cal) =a _(sz)/cos λ  75.The new calibrated data arrays a_(sy-cal) and a_(sz-cal) are now usedand replaces all a_(sy) and a_(sz) values in previous equations whichcomplete the detection and calibration of club head module mountingerrors due to a mounting error rotation around the x_(f)-axis 104.

Thereby, the preferred embodiment described above, is able to define thedynamic relationship between the module 101 measured axes coordinatesystem and the inertial acceleration force axes coordinate system usingthe multi-lever model and to define all related angle behaviors,including module 101 mounting errors.

All of the dynamically changing golf metrics described as angle and oramplitude values change with respect to time. To visually convey thesemetrics to the golfer, they are graphed in the form of value versustime. The graphing function can be a separate computer program thatretrieves output data from the computational algorithm or the graphingfunction can be integrated in to a single program that includes thecomputational algorithm.

The standard golf swing can be broken into four basic interrelated swingsegments that include the backswing, pause and reversal, down stroke,also called the power-stroke, and follow-through. With all anglesbetween coordinate systems defined and the ability to separatecentrifugal inertial component from inertial spatial translationcomponents for each club head module measured axis, the relationships ofthe data component dynamics can now be evaluated to define triggerpoints that can indicate start points, end points, or transition pointsfrom one swing segment to another. These trigger points are related tospecific samples with specific time relationships defined with all otherpoints, allowing precise time durations for each swing segment to bedefined. The logic function that is employed to define a trigger pointcan vary since there are many different conditional relationships thatcan be employed to conclude the same trigger point. As an example, thelogic to define the trigger point that defines the transition betweenthe back swing segment and the pause and reversal segment is:If a _(z)-radial(tn)<1.5 gANDa _(sx)-linear(tn)=0ANDAVG(a _(sx)-linear(tn−5)thru a _(sx)-linear(tn))<−1.2 gANDAVG(a _(sx)-linear(tn)thru a _(sx)-linear(tn+5))>+1.2 gBy defining the exact time duration for each swing segment andunderstanding that each swing segment is related and continuous with anadjacent segment, the golfer can focus improvement strategies moreprecisely by examining swing segments separately.

By incorporating a low mass object that is used as a substitute striketarget for an actual golf ball the time relationship between maximumclub head velocity and contact with the strike target can be achieved.The low mass object, such as a golf waffle ball, can create a smallperturbation which can be detected by at least one of the sensormeasurements without substantially changing the characteristics of theoverall measurements. In addition, the mass of the substitute strikeobject is small enough that it does not substantially change theinertial acceleration forces acting on the club head or the dynamicallychanging relationship of the inertial axes coordinate system in relationto the module measured axes coordinate system.

The data transfer from the club head module 101 to a user interface cantake place in two different ways: 1) wirelessly to a receiver moduleplugged into a laptop or other smart device, or 2) a wired path to auser module that is attached to the golf club near the golf club grip.

The preferred embodiment as shown in FIG. 13 demonstrates the module 101transmitting measured data through a wireless method 1303 to a receivermodule 1301 that is plugged into a computer laptop 1302. The receivermodule 1301 transfers the data through a USB port to the computer laptop1302 where the data is processed by the computational algorithm anddisplayed to the golfer 301.

In another embodiment, as shown in FIG. 14, the club head module 101communicates swing data through a wired connection 1401 to a userinterface module 1402 that is attached to the club shaft 202 below thegrip 1403. The interface module 1402 contains the processing power tocompute the metrics and display those metrics on the graphical and textdisplay 1404.

The approach developed above can also be applied for a golf club swingwhen the golf club head contacts the golf ball. For this case, the aboveanalysis returns the values of the three angles and club head velocityjust before impact. Using these values along with the sensormeasurements after impact describing the change in momentum and theabrupt orientation change between the module's measured sensorcoordinate system and the inertial motional acceleration forcecoordinate system will enable the determination of where on the clubhead face the ball was hit, and the golf ball velocity.

The ability to correlate the acceleration measurements and resultingdynamics golf metrics time line to a spatial reference allows keydynamics swing metrics to be further evaluated in the contexts of space.This offers golfers great analytical benefit when evaluating a free golfswing that does not impact an object. The swing metrics can be analyzedin relation to key spatial reference locations, such as anticipated balllocation, peak elevation of backswing, peak elevation of power-stroke,peak elevation of follow through and others such as club head travelpath 90 degrees out from right or left shoulder. These spatial referencepoints all offer their own set of benefits when analyzing the varieddynamic swing metrics in reference to spatial locations near the clubhead travel path. True swing efficiency and effectiveness can now beevaluate without the motional perturbations that occur when the golfclub strikes and object such as a golf ball. The benefit of analyzing afree swing as opposed to an impact swing can be demonstrated with afundamental example of evaluating swing efficiency with respect to thedynamic swing metric of club head velocity which is directly related toachievable ball trajectory distance. In this example a golfer may wantto improve and optimize their swing style for maximum distance. Usingfree swing measurements and analysis that provides dynamic club headvelocity in relation to an anticipated ball location allows the golferto evaluate if they are reaching maximum club head velocity before, at,or after the anticipated ball location. This is not possible withclub/ball impact because of the abrupt velocity reduction resulting fromimpact eliminating the ability to determine where maximum velocity wouldhave occurred after impact. Further, the swing style can be modified formaximum power and efficiency by aligning club head maximum velocity withanticipated ball location for maximum energy transfer at anticipatedball location. The same benefit themes demonstrated with the club headvelocity example also can be applied to all dynamics swing metrics suchas but not limited to, club head spatial acceleration and maximum clubhead spatial acceleration, club face angle and where the club face anglereached a square position, shaft flex lag/lead angle and many others.

These measurement and evaluation capabilities are not available withconventional swing analyzers that rely impacting with a golf ball,because the impact itself abruptly changes all swing metrics includingclub head orientation, club head motion and shaft actions and thereforeeliminates the possibility of comprehensive analysis of true swingperformance.

Several embodiments of correlation methods are demonstrated using theintegration of conventional Receiver Signal Strength Indicator (alsoreferred to as RSSI) functionality into the previously recited swingmeasurement and analysis system. The system uses RSSI to determinerelative spatial relationships between the Club Head Module 101 (firstmodule) and the USB Module 1301 (second module) during the entire swing.The spatial relationships, such as nearest together or farthest apart orequivalents or ratios are used to identify club head location(s) at apoint or points in time that correspond to time location(s) on theacceleration measurement time line thereby correlating space an time.

As shown in FIGS. 15 and 15A of the first embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, the Club Head Module 101 (first module) comprises allexisting electronics functions 1501, that include: a means ofmeasurement of three orthogonal acceleration axes, implemented with athree axis accelerometer device or a combination of single or dual axisaccelerometer devices to achieve acceleration measurement of threeorthogonal axes, a means for an antenna that can be a PC embeddedantenna or a chip component antenna, RF wireless communication functionsproviding a means for transmitting RF signals and a means of receivingRF signals implemented with common off the shelf RF integrated circuitdevice(s), circuit control and data processing and data formattingfunctions that provide a means for controlling all circuit functions, ameans for data acquisition and a means for formatting data for variousprotocol structures all implemented with a common off the shelfintegrated circuit device typically labeled MCU or Micro ControllerUnit, an energy source function providing a means for an energy supplyto operate circuitry and is implemented with a battery device. Furtherthe Club Head Module 101 (first module) comprises additional electronicfunctionality 1502 that includes a means for measuring receiver signalstrength that is implemented with common off the shelf RSSI circuitrythat may be included in common off the shelf RF integrated circuitsdevices.

As shown in FIGS. 15B and 15C of the first embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, the USB Module 1301 (second module) comprises all earlierrecited existing electronic functions 1503 including an antenna functionproviding a means for an omni-directional or near omni-direction RFantenna that can be implemented as a PCB (Parts Circuit Board) embeddedantenna or a chip component surface mount antenna device, RF wirelesscommunication functions providing a means for transmitting RF signalsand a means of receiving RF signals implemented with common off theshelf RF integrated circuit device(s), a means for data acquisition anda means for formatting data and a means for bidirectional communicationusing standard common interface protocols for transmitting data to andreceiving data from a user interface device all implemented with acommon off the shelf integrated circuit device typically labeled MCU orMicro Controller Unit, and in this example the common interface protocolis consistent with a USB port.

FIGS. 16, 16A and 16B of the first embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation shows the system configuration and operation. As shown inFIG. 16 the system comprising a user interface 1302 (a laptop in thisexample) with computation engine, display and standard input output portconnections, in this example a USB port and is connect to a USB Cable1601 (wired connection) that is further connected to USB Module 1301(second module). The USB module 1301 (second module) is placed remotelyfrom user interface 1302 at a predetermine location. FIGS. 16A and 16Bshow a front view perspective and a side view perspective respectivelyof the club head travel path 307 of a golf swing and FIG. 16B furthershows an anticipated location of a golf ball 1602. A predeterminedsingle location can be anywhere near the anticipated golf head travelpath 307. Examples of predetermined location options can include, butnot limited to, location 1603, 1604, 1605 and 1606. In this embodimentthe USB module 1301 is located at predetermined location 1603 that isclose to club head travel path 307 and in front of anticipated balllocation 1602. Operationally, the golfer takes a swing, the Club HeadModule 101 (first module) attached to club head top surface, travelsalong the club head travel path 307 and simultaneously Club Head Module101 measures three dimensional acceleration and synchronously and timealigned measures received strength for received wireless signaltransmitted by USB module 1301. Further, Club Head Module 101 (firstmodule) is capturing and transmitting measurement data comprisingacceleration and received signal strength measurements to USB Module1301 for further transport to User Interface 1302 with computationalengine.

A software application of the first embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation resides on User Interface 1302 computational engine andcomprising all functions for user interface, display and data processingof measurements within software application. The data processing ofmeasurements includes the previously recited algorithms for club headalignment calibration and acceleration data analysis. Further, softwareapplication implements a third algorithm that processes the receiversignal strength measurements in conjunction with synchronizedacceleration measurements to determine time space correlation. The thirdalgorithm processes steps of the first embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation include the step of:

-   -   1. Digitally low pass filter RSSI measured time line data to        reduce effects of RF multipath fading    -   2. Processes filtered RSSI data using peak detection and minimum        detection methods to determine time points on time line of        highest and lowest signal strength    -   3. Flag and label time point of peak RSSI measurement defining        the relationship of Club Head Module 101 and USB Module 1301 at        minimum spatial separation.    -   4. Flag and label time point of minimum RSSI measurement        defining the spatial relationship of Club Head Module 101 and        USB Module 1301 at maximum spatial separation.    -   5. Label the correlated time points on the acceleration        measurements and dynamics golf metrics results time line        defining space time relationship.

As shown in FIGS. 17 and 17A of the second embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, the Club Head Module 101 (first module), comprises allexisting electronics functions 1701, that include a means of measurementof three orthogonal acceleration axes, that can include but are notlimited to the use of a three axis accelerometer device or a combinationof single or dual axis accelerometer devices to achieve accelerationmeasurement of three orthogonal axes, a means for an antenna that can bea PCB embedded antenna or a chip component antenna, RF wirelesscommunication functions providing a means for transmitting RF signalsand a means of receiving RF signals implemented with common off theshelf RF integrated circuit device(s), circuit control and dataprocessing and data formatting functions that provide a means forcontrolling all circuit functions, a means for data acquisition and ameans for formatting data for various protocol structure all implementedwith a common off the shelf integrated circuit device typically labeledMCU or Micro Controller Unit, an energy source function providing ameans for an energy supply to operate circuitry and implemented with abattery device.

As shown in FIGS. 17B and 17C of the second embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, the USB Module 1301 (second module) comprises all earlierrecited existing electronic functions 1702 including an antenna functionproviding a means for an omni-directional or near omni-direction orsemi-omni directional RF antenna that can be implemented as a PCB (PartsCircuit Board) embedded antenna or a chip component surface mountantenna device or a stand-alone antenna device, RF wirelesscommunication functions providing a means for transmitting RF signalsand a means of receiving RF signals implemented with common off theshelf RF integrated circuit device(s), control, capture and formattingfunctions that provide a means for controlling all circuit operations, ameans for data acquisition and a means for formatting data and a meansfor bidirectional communication using standard common interfaceprotocols for transmitting and receiving data from a user interfacedevice all implemented with a common off the shelf integrated circuitdevice typically labeled MCU or Micro Controller Unit, and in thisembodiment the common interface protocol is consistent with a USB port.Further the USB Module 1301 (second module) comprises additionalelectronic functionality 1703 that includes a means for measuringreceiver signal strength that is implemented with common off the shelfRSSI circuitry that typically can be included in common off the shelf RFintegrated circuits devices.

FIGS. 16, 16A and 16B of the second embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation shows the system configuration and operation. As shown inFIG. 16 the system comprising a user interface 1302 (a laptop in thisexample) with computation engine, display and standard input output portconnections, in this example a USB port and is connect to a USB cable1601 (wired connection) that is further connected to USB Module 1301(second module). The USB module 1301 (second module) is placed remotelyfrom user interface 1302 at a predetermine location. FIGS. 16A and 16Bshows a front view perspective and a side view perspective respectivelyof the club head travel path 307 of a golf swing and FIG. 16B furthershows an anticipated location of a golf ball 1602. The predeterminedsingle location can be anywhere near the anticipated golf club headtravel path 307. Examples of predetermined location options can includebut are not limited to locations 1603, 1604, 1605 and 1606. In thisexample the USB module 1301 (second module) is located at predeterminedlocation 1603 that is close to club head travel path 307 and in front ofanticipated ball location 1602. Operationally, the golfer takes a swing,the Club Head Module 101 (first module) travels along the club headtravel path 307 and Club Head Module 101 (first module) transmitswireless signal carrying acceleration measurement to USB Module 1301(second module). USB Module 1301 (second module) receives wirelesssignal carrying acceleration measurements and measures received signalstrength of signal carrying acceleration measurements. USB Module 1301(second module) further combines acceleration and received signalstrength measurements together in a synchronized fashion and furthertransmits combined measurements through USB cable to User Interface 1302computation engine.

A software application of the second embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, resides on User Interface 1302 computational engine andcomprising all functions for User Interface's 1302, display and dataprocessing of measurements within software application. The dataprocessing of measurements includes the previously recited algorithmsfor Club Head Module 101 Alignment Calibration and Acceleration DataAnalysis. Further, software application implements a third algorithmthat processes the receiver signal strength measurements in conjunctionwith synchronized acceleration measurements to determine time spacecorrelation. The third algorithm of the second embodiment of thetime-space correlation includes the steps of:

-   -   1. A means of calculating time delay between measurements made        at Club Head Module 101 (first module) and measurements made at        USB Module 1301 (second module) comprising the steps of:        -   a. Define time duration of processing at Club Head Module            101 after acceleration signal is in a sample and hold state            by multiplying the time duration of 1 instruction multiplied            by number of instruction to complete the following tasks            -   i. Data capture            -   ii. Data formatting for wireless transmission protocol        -   b. If wireless communication protocol uses Time Division            Multiple Access (TDMA) structure, define the time duration            between wireless packet transmissions based on that            predefined structure.        -   c. Define time duration of signal propagation=0        -   d. Define time duration of processing at USB Module 1301 by            multiplying the time duration of 1 instruction multiplied by            number of instruction to complete the following tasks:            -   i. receive and demodulate Club Head Module 101                transmitted signal            -   ii. Receiver signal strength output from RSSI circuitry                at a sample and hold state for measurement        -   e. Sum steps (a.) and (b.) and (c.) and (d.) together to            define time delay between measurements to define time delay            between Club Head Module 101 measurements and USB Module            1302 measurements    -   2. Time shift the measurement time line taken at the Club Head        Module 101 (first module) in relation to measurements time line        taken at USB Module 1301 (second module) by said time delay to        define a single time line comprising all measurements        synchronized and aligned in time.    -   3. Digitally low pass filter RSSI measured time line data to        reduce effects of RF multipath fading    -   4. Processes filtered RSSI data using peak detection and minimum        detection methods to determine time points on time line of        highest and lowest signal strength    -   5. Flag and label time point of peak RSSI measurement defining        the relationship of Club Head Module 101 and USB Module 1301 at        minimum spatial separation.    -   6. Flag and label time point of minimum RSSI measurement        defining the spatial relationship of Club Head Module 101 and        USB Module 1301 at maximum spatial separation.    -   7. Label the correlated time points with acceleration        measurements and resulting dynamics golf metrics time line        defining space time relationship.

As shown in FIGS. 17 and 17A of the third embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation, the Club Head Module 101 (first module), comprises allexisting electronics functions 1701, that include a means of measurementof three orthogonal acceleration axes, that can be implemented with butare not limited to the use of a three axis accelerometer device or anycombination of single or dual axes accelerometer devices to achieveacceleration measurement of three orthogonal axes, a means for anantenna that can be implemented with a PCB embedded antenna or a chipcomponent antenna, RF wireless communication functions providing a meansfor transmitting RF signals and a means of receiving RF signalsimplemented with common off the shelf RF integrated circuit device(s),circuit control and data processing and data formatting functions thatprovide a means for controlling all circuit functions, a means for dataacquisition and a means for formatting data for various protocolstructure all implemented with a common off the shelf integrated circuitdevice(s) typically labeled MCU or Micro Controller Unit, an energysource function providing a means for an energy supply to operatecircuitry and implemented with a battery device.

As shown in FIGS. 18 and 18A of the third embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation the USB Module 1301 (second module) has addition connectionscomprising electrical connectivity to one or more wired coaxial cables1801 and or 1802 that further electrically connect to one or moreomni-directional or near omni-direction external antennas 1803 and or1804. As shown in FIG. 18A, USB Module 1301 (second module) comprisesearlier recited existing electronic functions 1805 including an antennafunction providing a means for an omni-directional or nearomni-directional RF antenna that can be implemented as a PCB (PartsCircuit Board) embedded antenna or a chip component surface mountantenna device or other, RF wireless communication functions providing ameans for transmitting RF signals and a means of receiving RF signalsimplemented with common off the shelf RF integrated circuit device(s), ameans for data acquisition and a means for formatting data and a meansfor bidirectional communication using standard common interfaceprotocols for transmitting and receiving data to and from a userinterface device all means implemented with a common off the shelfintegrated circuit device typically labeled MCU or Micro ControllerUnit, and in this example the common interface protocol is consistentwith a USB port. Further, USB Module 1301 (second module) comprisesadditional electronic functionality 1806 that includes a means formeasuring receiver signal strength of one antenna within USB Module 1301(second module) and a means for measuring receiver signal strength ofone or more external remote antennas. In this embodiment a means formeasuring signal strength at remote antennas 1803 and 1804. The receiversignal strength measurement functions provide a means for measuringsignal strength of all antennas separately and can be implemented withseparate RSSI circuitries that can be integrated into a single RFintegrated circuit device or implemented with separate RSSI circuitryeach being a separate integrated circuit device.

FIGS. 19, 19A and 19B of the third embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation shows the system configuration and operation. As shown inFIG. 19 the system comprising a User Interface 1302 (a laptop in thisexample) with computation engine, display and standard input output portconnections, and in this example the port connection is a USB port andis connect to a USB Cable 1601 (wired connection) that is furtherconnected to USB Module 1301 (second module). The USB Module 1301(second module) is placed remotely from user interface 1302 at apredetermine location. FIGS. 16A and 16B show a front view perspectiveand a side view perspective respectively of the club head travel path307 of a golf swing and further FIG. 16B shows an anticipated locationof a golf ball 1602. The placement of USB Module 1301 (second module)and remote antennas 1803 and 1804 can be any combination of separatepredetermined location near the anticipated golf head travel path 307.Further the spatial club head location during any point in the swing canbe defined in terms of one dimension, two dimensions or threedimensions. The presented example system configuration and operationthat is not intended to limit the scope of invention in any way ispresented. As shown in FIGS. 19 a and 19B for this example, theplacement for the USB Module 1301 (second module) is at predeterminedlocation 1603 that is near the anticipated club head travel path 307 andin front of the anticipated ball location 1602. Further in this example,first remote antenna 1803 is place at predetermine location 1901 that isnear and below club head travel path, and second remote antenna 1804 isplaced at predetermined location 1902 that is near and above anticipatedclub head travel path 307 and may be vertically aligned withpredetermined location 1901.

The system operation as shown in FIGS. 19A and 19B for this exampleincludes, the golfer takes a swing, the Club Head Module 101 (firstmodule) travels along a club head travel path 307 and Club Head Module101 transmits out wireless signal carrying acceleration measurements.Further USB Module 1301 (second module) and remote antennas 1803 and1804 receive wireless signal carrying acceleration measurements andfurther USB Module 1301 (second module) separately measuressynchronously received signal strength of all antennas. USB Module 1301(second module) further combines acceleration measurements and allreceived signal strength measurements together in a synchronized fashionand further transmits combined measurements through USB cable to UserInterface 1302 computation engine.

A software application of the third embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation for this example, resides on User Interface 1302computational engine and comprising all functions for User Interface,display and data processing of measurements within software application.The data processing of measurements includes the previously recitedalgorithms for Club Head Module 101 alignment calibration andacceleration data analysis. Further, software application implements athird algorithm that processes all receiver signal strength measurementsfrom all antennas in conjunction with synchronized accelerationmeasurements to determine time space correlation. The third algorithm ofthe third embodiment of the time-space correlation include the steps of:

-   -   1. A means of calculating time delay between measurements made        at Club Head Module 101 (first module) and synchronized        measurements made at USB Module 1301 (second module) for        internal and remote antennas comprising the steps of:        -   a. Define time duration of processing at Club Head Module            101 after acceleration signal is in a sample and hold state            by multiplying the time duration of 1 instruction multiplied            by number of instruction to complete the following tasks            -   i. Data capture            -   ii. Data formatting for wireless transmission protocol        -   b. If wireless communication protocol uses Time Division            Multiple Access (TDMA) structure, define the time duration            between wireless packet transmissions based on that            predefined structure.        -   c. Define time duration of signal propagation=0        -   d. Define time duration of processing at USB Module 1301 by            multiplying the time duration of 1 instruction multiplied by            number of instruction to complete the following tasks:            -   i. receive and demodulate Club Head Module 101                transmitted signal            -   ii. Receiver signal strength output from parallel RSSI                circuitries at a sample and hold state for measurement        -   e. Sum steps (a.) and (b.) and (c.) and (d.) together to            define time delay between measurements to define time delay            between Club Head Module 101 measurements and USB Module            1302 measurements    -   2. Time shift the measurement time line taken at the Club Head        Module 101 (first module) in relation to the synchronized group        of received signal strength measurements time line taken at USB        Module 1301 (second module) for internal and remote antennas        1803 and 1804 to define a single time line with calculated said        time delay between measurements removed.    -   3. Digitally low pass filter all RSSI measurements time lines        separately to reduce effects of RF multipath fading.    -   4. Processes each filtered RSSI data set separately using peak        detection and minimum detection methods to determine time points        on time line of highest and lowest signal strength for each        predetermined location    -   5. Process each filtered RSSI data set in relation to one        another and evaluate for equivalent RSSI measurements at a        single time point.    -   6. Flag and label each time point of each peak RSSI measurement        time line defining the relationship of Club Head Module 101 and        USB Module 1301 at minimum spatial separation and further Club        Head Module 101 and each remote antenna at minimum spatial        separations.    -   7. Flag and label each time point of each minimum RSSI        measurement time line defining the relationship of Club Head        Module 101 and USB Module 1301 at maximum spatial separation and        further Club Head Module 101 and each remote antenna at maximum        spatial separations.    -   8. Flag and label each time point of each occurrence when two        RSSI measurements time lines are equivalent at the same time        point defining the relationship of Club Head Module 101 and any        two antennas have equal spatial separation.    -   9. Label the correlated time points with acceleration        measurements and resulting dynamics golf metrics time line        defining time space relationship.    -   10. Use flagged time line points and predetermined locations of        each antenna to map 3 dimension space club head travel on club        head travel path.

Invention anticipates that using three antenna located at any threepredefined locations can map spatial club head travel in three dimensionand correlate to acceleration measurement time line, however, portionsof club head travel path can be more accurately represent spatiallywhile reducing accuracy of other portions of the swing, with strategicpredetermined locations focusing on providing more accuracy to a givenportion or portions of a swing. In the example recited above theaccuracy of the backswing and the power-stroke along with anticipatedball location have emphasis with regards to accuracy. In addition use ofmore than three antennas each with a predetermined location can increasethree dimensional spatial accuracy of club head travel path over broadercoverage of entire swing.

A forth embodiment of the time space correlation system provides forRSSI measurement capabilities at both the Club Head Module 101 (firstmodule) as described in first embodiment and shown in FIGS. 15, 15A andat the USB Module 1301 (second module) as described in the secondembodiment and shown in FIGS. 17B, 17C. The redundant nature of RSSImeasurement made at Club Head Module 101 (first module) and USB Module1301 (second module) offer benefits in two areas. The first benefit isthat the delay between measurements made at the Club Head Module 101(first module) and measurements made at the USB Module 1301 (secondModule) can be compared directly to define the time delay betweenmeasurement modules by analyzing the time separation of peak RSSImeasurement made at each of the modules. This is in contrast to theearlier recited second and third embodiments of time space correlationthat calculate time delay based on the Club Head Module 101 (firstmodule) and USB Module 1301 (second module) electronic processing timeof the electronic functions that include data capture, data formattingfor transmission over RF wireless channel and received data formattingat the USB Module 1301 (second module). The second benefit is thereduced effects of multipath fading because the overall RSSI vs. timecurves for both RSSI measurements should be identical with the exceptionof multipath fading characteristics. These benefits effectively simplifythe algorithm for calculating the time space correlation.

FIGS. 16, 16A and 16B, of the fourth embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation show the system configuration and operation. As shown inFIG. 16 the system comprising a user interface 1302 (a laptop in thisexample) with computation engine, display and standard input output portconnections, in this example a USB port and is connect to a USB Cable1601 (wired connection) that is further connected to USB Module 1301(second module). The USB module 1301 (second module) is placed remotelyfrom user interface 1302 at a predetermine location. FIGS. 16A and 16Bshows a front view perspective and a side view perspective respectivelyof the club head travel path 307 of a golf swing and FIG. 16B furthershows an anticipated location of a golf ball 1602. The predeterminedlocation can be anywhere near the anticipated golf head travel path 307.Examples of predetermined location options can include but not limitedto location 1603, 1604, 1605 and 1606. In this example the USB module1301 is located at predetermined location 1603 that is close to clubhead travel path 307 and in front of anticipated golf ball location1602. Operationally, the golfer takes a swing, the Club Head Module 101(first module) travels along the club head travel path 307 and Club HeadModule 101 (first module) measures acceleration and measures receiversignal strength of a signal transmitted from USB Module 1301 (second).Further Club Head Module 101 (first module) transmits measuredacceleration and receiver signal strength measurements with a wirelesssignal to USB Module 1301. Further USB Module 1301 receives wirelesssignal carrying Club Head Module 101 measurements and USB Module 1301measures received signal strength of signal carrying Club Head Moduletransmitted measurements. Further, USB Module combines measurements madeat Club Head Module 101 and USB Module 1301 in a synchronized fashionand transports all measurements to a user interface with a computationengine.

A software application of the fourth embodiment of the time-spacecorrelation for this example, resides on User Interface 1302computational engine and comprising all functions for User Interface,display and data processing of measurements within software application.The data processing of measurements includes the previously recitedalgorithms for Club Head Module 101 alignment calibration andacceleration data analysis. Further, software application implements athird algorithm that processes all receiver signal strength measurementsfrom all antennas in conjunction with synchronized accelerationmeasurements to determine time space correlation. The third algorithm ofthe fourth embodiment of the time-space correlation includes the stepsof:

-   1. Digitally low pass filter Club Head Module 101 (first module)    RSSI measured time line data to reduce effects of RF multipath    fading-   2. Digitally low pass filter USB Module (second module) RSSI    measured time line data to reduce effects of RF multipath fading-   3. Processes both filtered RSSI time line measurements separately    using peak detection and minimum detection methods to determine time    points on time line of highest and lowest signal strength-   4. Define time delay as time separation between RSSI measurements    peaks taken at Club Head Module 101 (first module) and USB Module    1301 (second module)-   5. Time shift Club Head Module 101 (first module) measurement time    line in relation to USB Module (101) measurement time line by said    time delay to define a single time line comprising all measurements    synchronized and aligned in time with respect to time of    measurement.-   6. Flag and label time point of peak RSSI measurement defining the    relationship of Club Head Module 101 and USB Module 1301 at minimum    spatial separation.-   7. Flag and label time point of minimum RSSI measurement defining    the spatial relationship of Club Head Module 101 and USB Module 1301    at maximum spatial separation.-   8. Label the correlated time points with acceleration measurements    and resulting dynamics golf metrics time line defining time space    correlation.

It is also anticipated that other embodiment arrangements of RSSImeasurements exist and are covered by this invention. The may include acombination of embodiments 3 and 4 where RSSI is measure at Club HeadModule 101 and USB Module 1301 connected further with remote antennasthat transit signal and measure RSSI of received signals.

As shown in FIG. 20, the time space correlations of embodiments one ortwo or four enables for the estimation of swing plane angle 2001 inrelation to ground plain. The means of calculating a line 402 and it'sangle 2001 to the ground that is coincident with swing plane isaccomplished with the addition user input into the system that includesthe shoulder height 2002 of the golfer. A right triangle is defined withshoulder height 2002 of golfer being one side of triangle that isperpendicular with triangle side 2003 that is coincident with groundplain and dynamic swing radius 402 being third side 402 of triangle. Thedynamics swing radius 402 is derived from acceleration measurement timeline using equation 25. The time space correlation based on thepredetermined location defines instantaneous swing radius value requiredto define all angles of the right triangle including angle 2001 thatdefines swing plain angle to ground.

As shown in FIGS. 21 and 21A, the time space correlation of embodimentthree enables the calculation of swing plane directly relative topredetermined locations references and shoulder height. The swing planeis determined with three points which include the golfer's shoulderheight to the ground as a first point, a predetermined location near theground as a second point and the swing path point that occurs as theclub head passed between two other predetermined locations defining thethird point. As an example, using multiple predetermined locations suchas those in FIGS. 21 and 21A, two different swing planes can bedetermined, one for the backswing and one for the power-stroke or downswing. As shown in FIG. 21A the swing plane corresponding to thebackswing portion of the swing is determined by defining the spatiallocation of second point 2102 near the predetermined location 1603 andthe spatial location of the third point 2104 being determined by theratio the ratio of RSSI measurements defining club head location point2104 on the club head travel path as club head passes betweenpredetermined locations 1901 and 1902. The first point 2101 is definedby the predefined input of golfer's shoulder height and twoinstantaneous swing radius values on swing radius time line furthercorresponding to the club head passing through the second point 2102 andthird points 2104. The three points define the spatial plane of thebackswing. Similarly, as shown in FIG. 21 the swing plane associatedwith club head travel and during the power-stroke is defined by thethree points 2101, 2102 and 2103.

The described invention that includes the use receiver signal strengthmeasurements to create a spatial relationship to a measurement time linecan be utilized with any other type of sensor measurement taken on thesame time line. Similar to the club head module measurements recitedabove using three orthogonal acceleration measurements, the RSSImeasurements time line can be synchronized with measurement time linescreated by any combination of any type of sensor devices. For example, aRSSI measurements time line can be synchronized with measurement timelines created by a single sensor device or combination of sensor devicesof varied types that measure motional and or dynamics orientationcharacteristics from the group of: accelerometer(s), gyroscope(s) andmagneto resistive device(s) that can be incorporated into the club headsmodule.

Further, another embodiment uses RSSI measurements made at the club heador RSSI measurements made at a predetermined location from radio wavestransmitted from the club head (club head module) that are synchronizedwith any type of sensor devices located anywhere on or in the golf clubthat is not limited to the club head. The benefits of this are theability of relating all measurements time lines made anywhere on or inthe golf club to a spatial reference of the club head during a golfswing. The sensors that may be used, but are not limited to include:accelerometer(s), gyroscope(s), magneto resistive devices, pressuresensors, strains sensors and impact sensors. An example could be, theclub head module contains accelerometers to measure club head motion,the shaft has strain gages attached to measure flex, the upper part ofthe shaft just below the grip has gyroscopes attached to measure shaftrotation at that part of the shaft and the grip has pressure sensors tomeasure grip strength pressure. All of these sensors may be electricallyconnected to the central electronics that may be located in the clubhead module and all measurements synchronized with the RSSI measurementtime line that define the spatial relationship to a predeterminedlocation of the club head on that time line.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been disclosed,those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that changes canbe made to the specific embodiments without departing form the spiritand scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is not to berestricted, therefore, to the specific embodiments. Furthermore, it isintended that the appended claims cover any and all such applications,modifications, and embodiments within the scope of the presentinvention.

I claim:
 1. A golf measurement and analysis system comprising: a) a golfclub comprising a golf club shaft and a golf club head attached to saidgolf club shaft and said golf club head comprising a club head face; b)a first module attached to said golf club head comprising a firsttransceiver configured to: (1) receive radio wave signals and measuringreceiver signal strength with of said radio wave signals during a golfswing of said golf club with respect to time, thereby defining areceiver signal strength measurement time line; (2) transmit radio wavesignals defining a first module transmitted signal carrying saidreceiver signal strength measurement time line; and c) a second modulepositioned at a predetermined spatial location near said golf swing ofthe golf club and comprising a second transceiver configured to: (1)transmit said radio wave signals from at least one or more antennas tosaid first module, wherein the one or more antennas are: (a)electrically connected to said second module; and (b) placed at a secondpredetermined spatial location(s) near to said golf swing; and (2)receive said first module transmitted signal carrying said receivedsignal strength measurement time line at said one or more antennas. 2.The golf measurement and analysis system of claim 1, wherein: the one ormore antennas comprises at least one antenna located within said secondmodule.
 3. The golf measurement and analysis system of claim 1, wherein:the one or more antennas comprises one or more optional remote antennanot located within said second module.
 4. The golf measurement andanalysis system of claim 3, further comprising: d) a means of furthertransmitting said first module transmitted signal carrying signalreceiver strength measurement time line received by said second moduleto a user interface device; and e) a means of defining a relationshipcomprising: i) if said one or more optional remote antennas areutilized, defining said relationship between said receiver signalstrength measurement time line, said first predetermined spatiallocation, and said second predetermined spatial location(s); and ii) ifsaid one or more optional remote antennas are not utilized, definingsaid relationship between said receiver signal strength measurement timeline and said first predetermined spatial location.
 5. A golf club headmodule that is attachable to and detachable from a golf club head of agolf club, comprising: a) a first circuit to measure receiver signalstrength of a received radio frequency signal during a golf swing ofsaid golf club with respect to time, defining a receiver signal strengthmeasurement time line; b) one or more sensors that measure motionalcharacteristics of said golf club during said golf swing with respect tosaid time, defining a motional characteristics measurement time line,wherein said one or more sensors comprise at least one of: one or moreaccelerometers, one or more gyroscopes, and one or more magnetoresistive devices; c) one or more second circuits configured to: i)capture, process, and store said receiver signal strength measurementtime line and said motional characteristics measurement time line in asynchronous fashion, defining synchronized measurements; ii) wirelesslytransmit said synchronized measurements; and iii) receive wirelesssignals; and d) an energy storage device that supplies power to saidfirst circuit and said one or more second circuits.